I have no idea because in this sport anything can happen but it is interesting to see a guy take forty hard shots from Schmeling, a known hard...
Monzon was a true warrior beast that night .. very strong and focused .. no one had a clue he was that set lf caliber fighter coming into that fight.
Pretty good match ups ... Paq yes, Whitaker maybe, Mosley yes but very tough Oscar yes, Tito yes, Floyd yes/ maybe Vargas yes, Wright no...
I agree completely .. not just three years older but while he had fewer fights he had a much tougher road and a much better level of opposition...
he was a tough guy that could and did take a ton of punishment …he had little style or power.
There is not doubt that Monzon was a great fighter but how great I am not sure ... Im not blown away by his opposition but what dies impress me...
I've never been a fan of the peek a boo for Patterson and felt with his speed he'd have been better boxing and moving but that said he was a much...
People need t realize Sharkey was past it in the 1930's ... his prime was about 26 - 29 ... that said just rewatched it it was not only a very bad...
If it's M of Q Ali easily ... kind of like how Tyson will beat Ngannou ... if bareknuckle another sport all together ..
I loved Saad but he got hit way to easily .. Norton would have destroyed him ..,
Best shot was Archie Moore.
I think Thunder was faster and wold crack Jumbo ...
love Charles as an all time P4P great but his title opposition was very weak. Walcott aside , Maxim, Lesnavoch, Valentino, Beashore, Baroness and...
Dempseys now not just underrated but pretty much discounted all together. I can say the same for Johnson. Jack Sharkey. Joe Frazier Pinklon...
that’s a terrific description of them , rotten champs because of a lack of focus and drive but very good fighters.
