They're double digit title defense champions who have seen the one spot, arguable or not.
It's simply an advantage, just like tall guys gravitating to basketball. I think you know that.
2000 isn't an arbitrary number. It's literally the start of a millenium. Haye, Parker, and Povetkin have never been at the top of the division....
Even if Biggs fought a smart fight, he might get totally derailed by a cut.
Since 2000, we've had Vitali, Fury, Wlad, Wilder, and Joshua at the top. Usyk is outnumbered at a 5:1 ratio despite these guys appearing in the...
"It's difficult to give an exact ratio of 6'5" people for every 6'3" person, as height distribution is a continuous variable, not a discrete one....
Sure, bud.
Mayweather beat more lineal middleweight champions than GGG did, by two.
Larena has had a better career than Bentt other than one notable exception.
That's a cop out and false.
What does that make the Bentt fight?
Yeah, Paul Spadafora performed like an ATG against Porto Cardona.
I believe that “best versions” are usually due to who the opponent is and what kind of form the opponent is in plus random events in the ring.
No, he wouldn’t. Odds don’t work like that. He’d have to be a huge favorite on average to win ten times in a row.
Morrison would get murdered.
