:rofl
thats one of the reasons i think he loses to pac, who is a more effective (not indicative of who has more power) puncher.
fair enough. i see that as hamed's best chance at winning as well.
and people accuse pac nuthuggers of irrationality :lol:. more realistically hamed probably hit as hard as a strong 135-140 lb'er, thats still...
i'm not a hamed fan, but naz was certainly a tremendous puncher.
of course like all fighters, pacquiao certainly can be KO'ed. i'm not saying he's god like the hardcore nuthuggers here:lol:. but i think he gets...
agreed, it's 50-50 at best. but my analysis on it says that, in a puncher vs. puncher scenario, it's usually the most effective puncher who wins.
my thoughts on it were a page back. i just think that puncher vs. puncher, the more effective puncher wins. pac's straighter punches, beats...
anyway this poll was already done months back, and pac won by a wide margin. http://www.eastsideboxing.com/forum/showthread.php?t=11124
pac style always had barrera's number. the blue print to beating pac was to box him, as shown by jmm. morales also smartly boxed pac from the...
naz would have been taken apart by marquez round after brutal round. pac-naz would have been good, although i highly favor pac he has more of a...
jmm should have gotten his hands on him. he would have ripped this clown to shreds and **** on his magic carpet.
commendable, but against the elite his skills are'nt up to par. guzman is elite so this is'nt even worth discussing. i'm not even a fan of guzman.
considering valero has'nt proved himself against anyone of note, guzman is leagues above the hype that is valero. this is'nt even debatable.
i was pissed during de la hoya - quartey. i've always been a fan of quartey so i was upset when the golden fishnets got the win on him. oddly...
