isn't haye's missus due to give birth any day now? surely that would be occupying his mind a little? i'm sure i read that somewhere...
was this on 5live boxing last night?
it was only really going to be idle gossip from khan to get his name out there and make him appear a major name.
it doesn't scream "money" though, does it?
Never saw that one myself? Was it a good fight? ;)
American conspiracy sees Dirrell take this. If he doesn't, he goes out of the tournament to Froch on head to head. So Ward lets him win it....
have i left anyone off the list?
which of the currently active, former British World title holders do you think has the best chance of recapturing world honours? Enzo? Froch?...
I agree, i can see Froch ending up with 2 points but still going though on account of him beating Dirrell on head to head. That would really irk...
Oh the irony. It's "off", stupid.
shame for you that you "book" counts for ****.
As quoted above: Data Boxing Stats: Blows- Froch 153/475 32%, Dirrell 105/315 33%; Controls- Froch 123( 25 attacks), Dirrell 126( 29 clinches,...
Dirrell didn't actually do anything in order to win the fight. You need to fight in order to win a fight.
No, he didn't. I can state as an absolute, 100%, stone-walled fact, that Dirrell didn't take Froch's "0". Unless you saw an alternative...
as the kids would say: "lol"
