LOL that is _uckin halarious when you see put up like that... but the irony is you don't realise how tue that is when you break it down. Top 10...
great, great fighter, One of Hundreds - thats the best I can say about most of the greats...
:hat just being among the top fighters of this period equates to better than most other periods overall. also these were 5' 7" - 5' 10"...
:good I know that and for the most part it is the case world wide and age to age!
your right Conn and thats why I don't even bother to try and place fighters! you might be accurate in saying that 3, 5 or 10 of them are...
I don't he was honestly trolling, I believe he was wrongly thinking that by comparison America - the Land of Milk & Honey had everything they ever...
Top line.
from 190 - 225 he could well beat most fighters in recent years... above that it is S-HW, and they are a completely different animal and...
Walcott, Charles & Marshall Britain - Harvey, McAvoy & Gilroy recent years Lenard, Duran & Hearns smaller guys Carbajal, Camacho & Haugan...
POLL... Who wins Joppy or Greb... @ - Joppy wins @ - Greb wins @ - Don't be _ucken rediculous!
I've said it many times, and too many people get wrongly caught up in such analysis... there is NO Top 10, nor 25, nor 100. we can rate yes,...
different builds altogether, Mills was a genuiene L-HW, and a more easy transition to HW than you're suggesting, 5' 10" or so, and often walking...
the Brit need for a HW world champion knew no bounds, Mills was being sold as a HW hopefull as early as 1940 and actually challenged Louis in...
he wasn't a killer puncher but don't doubt for a minute there's no sting in his punches, he was a solid boxer proven and you don't 'stay off' the...
Maxim fought a **** load of far superior men, and here's the good part, great & noted Heavyweights!!! Oh no, wait... where's Joe, Bernard, Roy...
