joe louis.
good post but i disagree with the coming down in weight baloney. you can watch the video and see he wasn't the same. mackie shillstone stated...
:lol:
all of the brits here are the bigger fighters in these matchups. hagler should beat all of them but hearns and leonard might have trouble because...
jorodz and magoo, stop it. you guys are applying too much logic to your posts for the classic board to handle. :)
at 2:05. left uppercut, left hook, left hook. even gil clancy was amazed. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_X91ik2WgGA
great matchup. i'll take johnston by close decision. johnston never beat anyone as good as marquez but something tells me he could have pulled...
true but i've seen more legit pro wrestling bouts than pep's dive. he was so great he had no idea how to act like he was losing. :)
they all sucked bad but lewis-holyfield was in a class of it's own. there's just no effing way that fight was close. 3 of the 4 had a promoter...
it was probably fixed but it funny how guys like dempsey, pep, and lamotta almost get respect for throwing a fight. it's overlooked when judging...
bert sugar stated that dempsey hadn't had anything to eat for four days before the flynn ko loss. take what you will from that.
you're misunderstanding me. i agree with you. style wise sam and rocky were similar but you can't compare that version of sam to rocky.
hearns should have arrested the judges from his second fight with leonard.
agreed. too many things to take into account. h2h, skill level, quality of opponents, etc....
i really am having a tough time with a pick. i think it'd be a very ugly fight. lots of clinching. langford would be the opponent i would...
