Thanks, I don't mind arguing with you usually Dino. We talk **** to each other and disagree usually, but I respect you and your always gracious...
So, you've basically surrendered. Thanks
Agree to disagree on name value alone, but yes, manner of wins(and losses) are key
Peter top 5ish wins: Maskaev Toney(2) Top 25ish wins McCline Diaz, Williams, Shufford Another top performance: Nearly beating an atg in Wlad...
Clear, but bad. Sanders and Peter are arguably "at the level" of Saha and Byrd. There is more of an argument there than there is to compare them...
In other words, you are backtracking. Either way, if you are abandoning your position that they are above Vit, having them on the same level is...
Still arguing over trivialities that o already dealt with? Lol!
Vit top 10 ish wins Peter Sanders Adamek Johnson Hide Arreola Gomez Solis Donald( most completely dominated) Top 25ish Charr Briggs Sosnowski...
A fluky win means something, but not much. On the balance neither has a resume that can compete with Vits, and going fighter by fighter, it's not...
I've already addressed this in my posts A. On a level is little better than superior, both are crazy statements B. You said in a different post...
Resume it's not comparable either. Vits resume was always underrated, mainly because he didn't have the resume he should have, but it put either...
Cobras quote at the top of page 11 says he rates them at or above Vit. It's toward the bottom of a long quote. It's insane to even think they are...
You had an earlier quote saying at beat Vitali was on the same level. Either way, you are again focusing on a secondary point.
It is irrational to have Vitali at the level of Pov and Byrd as he has beaten people at approximately the level of them, has many more top 10, 20,...
Yep, that's clearly all you've got
