I'm not laughing at you mate. I'm fine with how the debate went and sorry if I have came across as hostile. I agree, yeah he was hesitant etc....
McGrain had no fans back in 07, son's thweads were being ignored just sayin
Yeah, his **** is huge too
I mean, I'm watching their first fight now. I don't know how one can disagree with this simple statement: Bernard Hopkins is having trouble...
Well first you said he was a Hopkins clone and now it's that he was a bit like Hopkins that night. We can speculate all day on what the reason...
:lol::D:deal
Wow, Hopkins decisioning Jean Pascal has sure made me think he would do the same to John Conteh or actually...:patsch
As in what though? He became a master boxer who employs dirty tactics for the night? I saw him mounting attacks behind his jab.
I disagree with that. I think Taylor's weakness has always been his lateral movement and don't think he has ever been strong there. Great jab...
Pacquiao
Except the Kalmbay-Hopkins match up, we disagree on these points. All opinion though
As I have already said though mate. I don't believe that Taylor did well because of his timing, I strongly believe it to be because of the speed...
I think Hopkins should be given a fine chance against Monzon myself, but not against Robinson. I favour Hagler over Hopkins.
Hopkins' positional knowledge, skills, footwork and ring generlaship are fantastic. I don't see how we can confidently assert that he would be...
I agree with this assessment of McCallum-Hopkins
