:hey Calzaghe barely > Taylor :cool:
I think Pavlik's style plays right into Calzaghe's.
:deal Close call on Moore
In a fight that many scored 1 point for Calzaghe, and many of them credible posters, how can you laugh at such a score? I personally had it...
Okay, I can see where this was going. Nothing I said was NOT true, though. Comparing Joe being close to 40 and Hops being close to 50, is unfair....
:lol: I suppose I was one of the people who requested this in the other thread. Cheers! :good ;)
Well, there were many idiots who thought Joe would dominate or even STOP Hopkins (claiming Joe could easilly be the FIRST to stop him) THAT...
:deal Another good one, and I agree again. :good EDIT: Although I personally find it hard to seperate Pac and JMM by so much. So I have Floyd...
With a couple of young undefeated fighters in between, during the fluff years. Not ATG level for me, YET.
:huh Why even mention that. I made MY comment, to which you replied with a "What the f u c k are you talking about?" Well, THIS is what...
Lacy syndrome! Damn Calzaghe fans and their memories. :D I find myself disagreeing with a lot of posters on this board about Mayweather,...
I still think he's great to watch at 43... I mean, how many fighters could compete at his level at his age, EVER? The guy looked great tonight...
Think a bit more before you let words out of your mouth (or onto your computer). Hopkins is 43. Add 7 years, he's 50. Minus 7 years, he's 36....
It was in response to other responses in this thread. I had already made my opinion clear on who I think would win, prime for prime. And yes, I...
And I said Joe was prime... Where?
