probably more Sugar fans feeling helpless their man didnt do better against Terry. trying to cheer themselves up by writing imaginary outcomes...
^ the cooney of 82 wouldve broken Mike in half. Mike is the better man but cooney hits too hard lookit how long he lasted w Tyson just by him...
what do they have to do with Sugar's 11 yr unbeaten streak?
I already got a preview from the Weaver triplets so it's not nearly as much surprise as u would hope. posted the photo about 4 yrs ago on ESB...
no, it's not at ALL like those fights becuz Sugar was winning, w no noticable droppoff :lol: you're just making it up! :D In fact, Sugar...
yeah, these guys NEVER learn, even going into the Camacho fight, let alone to get it right the first time when Sugar's only loss was to a name...
I think Floyd is great. Notice how he doesnt fall apart in fights just becuz he reached 34 years of age?
dont listen to him Frank. he's just some stupid trainer pushing 30 that thinks he's been around, a survivor of abortion, amateur psychologist to...
problem is u have nothing to work with. no proof of a win the way Norris has Terry's win was overwhelming while Sugar's loss to Norris was...
well if u went easy on the fabrication "Norris' handspeed was laughable, far slower than Leonard. Curry had faster hands. my dog had faster hands....
since when was Leonard washed up? unbeaten in 11 yrs, fought the perfect fight in uno mas. My man was just better and u cant admit to it Same...
early 80s Leonard, the one u keep imagining, with wins over Kalule & Bonds? wins over Nunn, Pryor, & Curry would convince me
not only do I believe it, but this has been PROVEN in actual combat situation in embarassingly LOPSIDED fashion check out Sugar's previous comp...
all fabrications sorry bro, cant go along with ANY of these false claims, especially the one where Leonard is faster than Norris :lol: never...
Sure i am. I was there for Terry's nat tv debut on ABC WWS vs Jackson and rooting for him to take him down but it was not to be. jackson was...
