Then why did Lewis have so many bad performances? Why did he lose to McCall and Rahman? Joshua has yet to lose at all, let alone to someone like...
Joshua by ko
No, I think Tyson is the one getting stopped
I think they could easily rate among the top 20 punchers of the 70s at least in terms of effectiveness.
If a bout with battling jim Johnson could be arranged than no doubt one with Langford can be arranged. The point is Johnson can't go around...
Sign to fight him again then
The point about Dempsey's speed and being proven against bigger men is interesting. However, he doesn't seem to have faced any big punchers so...
No doubt he could have found a way to make the fight happen somewhere, he faced Battling Jim Johnson who was black so clearly race wouldn't have...
If white America is pissed off Johnson has the option of fighting outside the United States where racism is less virulent.
Many champions consistently fought the best opponents available-Anthony Joshua, Wladimir Klitschko, Lennox Lewis, Evander Holyfield, to give a few...
The Joe Louis situation is not analogous because he had no outstanding black contenders that he ducked. None of them were able to fight their way...
If he wasn't satisfied with the offers he could always chose to relinquish his title
A champion is obligated to face his top contenders, lack of money in the fight is not an excuse for not making the fight.
The only big puncher Frazier faced demolished him and Norton lost to every big puncher he faced. Neither man would appear to possess the...
Well then Holyfield probably comes in third or fourth
