I know the question wasn't directed at me but if I may answer it, I think Tito lacked a great jab that his fellow welterweight counterparts...
So whats your thoughts on Hamed vs Pacquiao again?:D But back to your post, doesn't logic tell you that a fighter has to get drained at some...
Only an idiot would make such a dumb ass comment.
As for the highlighted parts, Cotto only got knockdown once at 140 and it was a debatable knockdown to say the least. I agree with the second...
Paul Williams looked shook as **** to take any chances against the Olympic Diver Kermit Cintron, I have a feeling he would be shook to take any...
I look forward to when RedRooster makes his stamp on this thread.:lol:
Angulo is the man, I'm a fan.
Pre-jail Kirkland vs Williams is a 50/50 fight.
Here's a quote from Nazim Richardson that should shut you Tito haters the **** up.... "To me, Trindad's situation was much, much different than...
Hamed was more cockier. (No Homo)
Vasquez is a good solid fighter, Oquendo sucks though.
Yeah but Augie Sanchez was garbage.
I'm gonna give Grant's jaw the benefit of the doubt here and say he loses to Adamek by UD.
That I would favor Pacquiao to beat Hamed but tricky things can happen to speedy fighters like Pacquiao when they face another fighter with some...
I read this whole thread from beginning to end.
