my point is mma has so many different things too it...many of them that can be done in a intensive condition building way...stand up...
I am not saying he is as good as Joe Louis in the skills department, or with firing combos..but his punches do seem to have a similar effect...bit...
hey look guys...i found a thread from back in the days when Stoo didnt hate me...its kind of sweet.
hmmmmm Johnson seemed to be a sore loser.
if you go on box rec danza's record is actually pretty good
prime bob hope likely beats mickey rourkes ass as well..that would be a fun thread..name people who would kick the **** out of rourke
yeah id say Pallance would..legit 200 pound fighter who was at least as good pound for pound as Danza and likely better.
many of Rourkes wins where either full on dives or really suspect guys...Danza fougth some legit fighters..and won.
I dont think this is a "classic" question (thought i guess they are both pro boxers from the past) but Danza has a much more legit fighting...
fights some what real but the mma guys keeping it under control.back stories seem fake. bullies and victims both getting some money
fun thing about wrestlers is that when they get into street fights they do actually try to throw hands most times....
yes most who enter classics..but not those who consider Ali to be some kind of a God.
thing is..in mma..you have so many different skills to learn..i mean hell boxers can spend hours a day training just boxing for yearsand never...
defense never was his strong point..nor was footwork....two things i thought he would need to have a shot in this fight....
i am kind of suprised Dempsey wasnt put in here...he is more of a legend that patterson.
