there was no calzaghe fight date set. it could have been about to be set in 2004 for all u know. You will never know the date of that fight, becos...
thanks, for reminding me of a matter.
negotiation, not fight. you continue to confuse the two. i can see why, it allows u to claim there is a gap of years between hopkins actual...
if bowe had easily been smashed by middlers retired 37 year old coetzer, tillery and bert cooper, the klit fan club would call it an open and shut...
and still it remains, the replacement for the "cazaghe fight" was the year preceding Oscar. It would be pointless for me to say it is set in...
sorry i was being sarcastic without fair due, but the mathematical pun of it being negative sarcasm was lost on me.
and it was still the fight that replaced a possible bout with calzaghe. and it was in the year preceding the bout with oscar. you cannot change...
the hakkar fight was a replacement for when negotiations with calzaghe halted? this is a fact that you and pals you "liked" have written. the...
and yet here u are in denial that his next bout post calzaghe negotiation was 2003. Its almost like you dont believe that Hakkar required some...
please continue.
no, it was one year between the 2 scheduled fights of hakkar and Oscar. It is your mistake to ignore facts. let me know why u do so, perhaps later...
if you say he fought hakker instead of calzage, then oscar was the next year after hakkar. Let me know why you lied, by trying to pretend that...
maybe, but your maths would still be wrong, pal. take it on the chin and learn from it, dont dig deeper.
bargaining with DLH. hahaha indeed.
poor mt green, there are better ways surely to pick up a retirement cheque.
