Holyfields a bad matchup for Tyson but Tyson backing into a decision here like he did with Tucker is a strong possibility. Tyson might never have...
If Terrell did as good as Wepner in 1967 against Ali would this not have really helped Terrells legacy?
The 30s era would box the ears off of this era. My god if you let Lee Murray loose in this era he'd wreck shop. Tommy Farr would decimate Tyson Fury.
No they wouldn't lol.
Yes I do. Preach Roy preach.
At a moment in time the outcome was in doubt. If it had went to the scorecards and for the final few rounds it wasn't. Theres also grading on a...
Maybe "he almost lost" was too strong language. But Wepner knocked down Ali and had the fight close fairly deep into the fight. If we're out...
It was for sure. They've made signifigant changes the jurys still out on.
If you look at the WBA tournament lineup from Terrels teams perspective would Spencer not be the "weak link" that you'd be happy to draw in the...
It was at that point in the 40s or 50s for the core divisions. If not earlier. Tweeners are usually pit stops so all their ATGs are associated...
During this era Louis's number 1 contenders didn't stick around long after losing to him. They didn't lose that status in the ring. In Galentos...
In the years between the Spencer and Merritt fights he seemed like he was fine though he took some time off. He had cases to win both the Ramos...
The reason that Galento was number 1 contender is that Lou Nova beat Max Baer and Farr for him and then he "beat" Nova. Braddock and John Henry...
John Henry Lewis.
Langford has like 100 quality wins at HW. Usyks got 8. Langfords over 8 inches shorter than Usyk.
