Ring Magazine felt that Roman was a top heavyweight and I disagree with that assessment and don't see any reasonable case for putting Roman in the...
Foreman losing to Ali in Zaire is fact not opinion. I cant see any reasonable case for putting Roman in the top 10 the people who ranked him...
Nope Ali was the best in 1973 and would have beaten Foreman had they fought.
The fact that he wasnt even the best of his own time id obviously pretty damning to his legacy. This point really is obvious and not open to...
Foreman not dominating his own era is fact not opinion, Foreman only beating 5 or 6 top contenders is another fact and Foreman only managing 2...
He was never the best heavyweight in the world at any time and on top of that has a very thin resume. Foreman only beat 5 top contenders his...
There is nothing on his resume to justify putting him in the top 10. He wasnt even the best of his own era He cant even beat the best of his own...
Forrman is overrated in the sense that some people try to put him in the top 10 and rank him alongside guys who dominated the division. Foreman...
Beating a 35 year old Jeffries who had not fought in six years does nothing to help Johnson's legacy. Johnson could have enhanced his legacy by...
Guys like Louis, Marciano, Ali, Lewis, etc all managed to establish themselves as the best heavyweights in the world something Foreman was never...
Frazier is a nice win but a big aspect of greatness is dominance. Bowe and Moorer have wins over Holyfield yet neither are considered ATGs....
Roman was not top 10 he had no s wins over notable opponents and always lost when he stepped up in competition. I dont see how any reasonable...
If Foreman wanted to be an ATG he had to beat Ali.
It depends how you define greatness. For me Foreman does not rank as great because he wasn't the best of his own time. He can't rank ahead of...
Cooney, Coetzer, Saverese etc were not ranked in the top 10. In his entire career Foreman appears to have only beat 5 guys ranked in the top 10....
