Foreman was as light as 212 as a pro and only 217 against Frazier and 218 against Chuvalo some of his best performances
Wouldn't this be a bad stylistic matchup for Tyson...kind of like facing a bigger, stronger Foreman with an even better chin.
I think the guys of Lewis era generally hit harder than the much smaller heavyweights of the 70s
Lennox Lewis for example would do great in the 70s
There are a number of guys from tysons era with a good shot at doing great in the 70s
The problem is all is his bad performances you have to also factor them into consideration
If David Tiberi can beat Toney than Golovkin might have a good shot
Sims and Laing were when Duran was past his prime and fighting far above his best weight. Toney has no excuses whatsoever for his losses.
Unless Montell Griffin is an AtG in your eyes
Maybe because ATGs are notsupposed to lose to guys like Tiberi and Griffin
Tunney wasn't tested against many quality heavies so there is no reason to assume he does well without evidence
Joshua is probably capable of taking Holmes shots all night if he wants but I doubt the reverse is true
What happens when Joshua hits the much smaller Holmes back?
You guys do realize that the size gap between Joshua and Holmes is equal to or greater than the size gap between Holmes and Charles and Joshua has...
Hard to gauge how durable he is given he didn't face punchers. The Golota fights suggest his punch resistance was somewhat lacking.
