No, but it's accurate and goes some way to disproving the idea that Fury and Wilder are somehow generating mega money between them.
It would also generate more in the UK (in terms of actual money generated) than Wilder Fury did in the US.
I think at the minute somewhere in the region of 30-40 percent would be fair based on what they respectively have done. I know people hate talking...
I don't think most people see Fury as number one though.
You don't get a split based on who is better. It's based on what you bring to the fight.
I genuinely don't understand your point. I'm not trolling. Indeed, I genuinely think with your Ali/Mayweather/Tyson comparisons and suggesting the...
Not sure why you seem to think 35% is outrageous but 40% is fair. I mean, they're pretty close.
I think the closest you can get to a direct comparison among all parties is that they're all looking to maximise their financial take and that...
I was. The first fight did pretty average numbers and the rematch will do more but nowhere near the numbers you think it will. Reasons why I think...
But it did less than the buys which Bradley Marquez did and to make Joshua money it's going to need to go stratospheric.
Probably 35% of the Joshua fight unless you're the sort of lunatic who thinks Wilder Fury II starts doing Lewis Tyson/De La Hoya Trinidad numbers.
Wilder's stock has been significantly higher. Before the Fury fight he was a stone cold killer, stopped every man he faced, and would blow away a...
Warren in fairness was an expert in this. He did it time and again with Calzaghe. Joe beats someone like Kabery Salem. Frank talks about an offer...
I'm not sure they have really. Indeed, I always felt that both have rather thought they got away with it in the way they've acted afterwards....
There's nothing wrong with venues that are appropriate for the level of popularity that the show has. However, there is something faintly tragic...
