looks very different to the version im using...you photoshop it?
i use them for my own business as well even in the usa they are both equal at the 30 point mark for the past year, infact haye has been searched...
so your saying everybody outside the uk only wants to watch the fight for wlad? none are watching for haye?
not true, i could probably name 20 people i know off the top of my head
you should go back to school
you just brain ****ed me....i look at the graphs and combined they dont have as many searches as haye...so whats your point?
thanks for proving my point, the klit cant even get above 10.0
haye went above 40, wlad can barely get above 10
the advertising, the fans, the money. whos getting more money? vitali for briggs or haye with harrison?
whos more marketable? haye, if you had a product who would you advertise it under? haye or wlad....haye because he gets 3x the hits, haye brings...
right so the question is...whos more marketable...the answer...david haye. Google doesnt lie.
such a bad glass jaw hes had five different belts, won two in foreign countries....and never been ko'd
fact is...David Haye is the bigger draw, look at google trends...he has 3x the searches wlad has. It should be 75% for Haye, 25% for Wlad...
chef, you are in the klit camp...so why wont the klit keep the german money, haye keep the british money and split the rest? it makes sense does...
setanta were paying him, they were doing his ppv, they went bust.
