:good ok, sorry. sometimes i forget when i'm not on the regular boxing forum and i usually have to explain the most common and obvious points i...
good points. it's still nice to see them in action. we have to take what little we can get from this era as far as footage goes. i have to...
he's in the modern class of the hall of fame. only old timers here. :good
yes, hamed was the clear favorite.
good call on gans. meant to put him in the original post.
corbett for sure. i feel langford was a great stalking, offensive fighter from what i've seen and he was almost always the smaller man. pacquiao...
agreed. unfortunately, you're starting to see this with a few former NFL players as well.
who from this era of fighters does or doesn't impress you from watching footage of them?...
true, but i love watching any footage of him.
btw, i'm pissed to see the wilde-villa footage is off youtube. if anyone has the fight and can upload or know where its' posted online, please...
i'm not totally counting wilde out but i agree with you. lopez is 5'5" to wilde's 5'0". i think lopez's jab carries him to a decision.
two of the best little men ever. who you got? http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FuymSM64vEA http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=igryTKKR2Nw
i'm just glad to see this argument is between two fighters that are the elite of the elite in the history of the sport. it's hard to argue...
yes in 2003. he hadn't ko'd evander yet when this issue came out i believe.
understand your points but evander is on a different level than the heavys you listed imo. your points could be one reason holyfield stayed away...
