no way, i said lewis opted for retirement. lewis was a great fighter. ask david haye and brit fans if they care about the belts. the belt is...
maybe your opinion but joe was never #1 lb for lb. pacquiao never lost to marquez and both were ranked ahead of joe. nice try.
fitz winning the title was a great accomplishment but it was done in an era where black fighters were not allowed to fight for the title. fitz...
wlad's wbo title at that time didn't carry as much weight as the other belts, then he was ko'ed by sanders. a fight with byrd probably could have...
the way jones beat him makes you think it's not great. he made ruiz look terrible. ruiz had wins over holyfield, rahman, golota, mccline and...
yes, ruiz wasn't the greatest opponent but winning a belt at heavy was a huge accomplishment from someone who started their career at jr. middle....
:lol: turpin's win over robinson alone makes him greater than joe.
116-112, de la hoya. should have been an easy win like vs trinidad.
more revisionist history by the chumps on these boards. it was the ring magazine event of the year. jones doesn't get the credit he deserves...
there's over 200 fighters in the hall of fame. he'll probably get voted in and will clearly be one of the worst to make it. he's not top 200.
holyfield stops patterson late imo.
if you go in the streets in the US and ask who is bernard hopkins?, maybe 1 out of 10 depending on where your at have heard of him. boxing isn't...
except michael smyth http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EWu1jycEbas
from what i saw the other night, wolak deserves a mention.
just right now.
