you're aware bn is a flat ayrton through virgin? it's sky adding the premium.
again, i'm unsure what you're trying to get at. sky charge a fee to connect viewers to boxnation, it's them doing the milking, this isn't open to...
that's sky charging you a premium to watch a competitor, and he's specifically comparing the ppv against the cost of bn, because they're similar....
not really what i was getting at. sure frank isn't my kinda guy but nor is rupert. banking, petrochemical and pharmaceutical (for example) firms...
true indeed, which is why i find it odd people single out boxnation because frank is affiliated.
if people choose to pay over the odds for a product, that's on them.
you seriously reckon rupert's a better option? you shouldn't've bought your moral compass from solaris, reality is more nuanced than good / frank.
sky sports is only £12 a month? is this accurate?
not really, unless you're stupid enough to think you're better off spending 3x as much for 1/30 of the product or you're heavily weighing your...
...
hey, it'd've been even nicer if the car had started!
bank job maybe!
yeah, but i reckon it's prudent not to allow gambling to become too convenient.
let's hope so, he was really good, depends how much inactivity and surgery have taken from him.
i did, just didn't realize you wanted acknowledgement. hope this suffices.
