ALL fighters look good when their opponent is covering up and not throwing punches. thats the example you just gave.
and why do you think roy and hopkins got these high profile fights anyway while they ruled weak divisions and a meaningful fight for calzaghe...
the fact is that calzaghe was always high risk low reward and never - never - pushed his profile or fanbase overseas so a fighter like hopkins or...
all fighters look good coming forward. like i said before both klitschko's are very powerful men, but wlad needs to feel he has contro, of the...
you can go back and forth on this all night. lewis is a better technical fighter than vitali and he has more ring smarts, but this was a...
love that uppercut by lewis though. best punch in the fight.
stopped on cuts when vitali was ahead on points. thats not a KO
tarver was in the right place at the right time when he fought jones. he'll always be remembered as the man who knocked out roy jones - but...
honestly. how can you say that an unbeaten hopkins (jones) was a better win than a hopkins with mixed results and on the slide(calzaghe). a...
really? when was vitali KO'd?
no i know who you are.
true but like i said below joe never fought hopkins or jones when he had the chance - and picked 43 year old hopkins over pavlik, who he dismissed...
hes not a 'fraud' no matter what. but i understand what you mean.
but he ruled his division on the world stage. his win against hopkins and ruiz will always rank above anything joe has done because of that.
no only when you lie to people about your 'contacts'. don't play dumb. you know what i mean.
