??? Anybody got an answer to this question??? I'm sure the winner of Froch-Inkin (who ONLY becmes the no. 1 contendor) STILL has to fight...
What's with everyone beating me to the post... with the EXACT same ****?
:huh I don't get some people's standards. Roy in his prime LOOKED like an A+ fighter... As too, say, a Pernell Whitaker. Very few people...
:lol: Amsterdam and his anti-so and so movements! Bute's a great guy and an attribute to the sport, regardless of being a B fighter or...
Is there anybody out there that can confirm which rule is right, without either of us having to go re-read them? If the champ vacates a title,...
Oooh, so now YOU don't wanna see Mundine vs Bute before Mundine's speed decreases? :D Mundine vs Kessler 2 (who beats both Bute and Froch)...
That's not the case. That's only the case SOMETIMES when the "mandatory" is the INTERIM title holder (the "interim" just gets dropped) As a WBC...
So is Frock-Inkin now for the vacant WBC title?!?!
So would I! :happy I'm actually calling for it, regardless of what others say about it. And if Inkin vs Froch is only a number one contendor...
But Inkin vs Froch is only a WBC #1 eliminitor, right? Meaning IF Calzaghe vacates his title, they will have to face the NEXT available...
With JT at WBC #4 too, we could also see Kessler-JT either before or after...
As a Bute fan, I don't think you REALLY mean this. :D Mundine UD, wider in Aus.
Mundine thoroughley dominated Hamdan, who while not winning rounds, showed a lot of heart in each round (sometimes looking hurt, only to come back...
And could Bute not be enticed to Australia? Mundine has a lot of $$$ behind him... And what if both wanted to stage the unifcation on US...
:good I also think Mundine beats Bute
