their current conditions, given the same set of opponents under the same circumstances, who would rake in more wins? right now, theoretically, i...
:thumbsup cool
i think it's also good to hear the opinion of others aside from what we can read from the internet. i've noticed langford seemed to have long...
the cut seemed to have bothered him a lot. blood was dripping to his eye. even without the cut though i think morales still would have won by...
ok what if floyd makes more then. what's the point? eitherway, it doesn't really matter.
who the **** cares about how much these guys make?
no fanboy, you are the dummy
how about the oscar floyd fought? would pac still have won?
from what i remember, roach was asking for a catchweigth at around 143. but then shane decided he could go as low as 140 and that he wanted to...
you think that was a legit test at 147? dela hoya barely hit him. and a drained dela hoya was not a good gauge if pac could take the punch of...
this was right after pac-hatton. pac hasn't tested himself out yet at 147 so whether it was cotto or mosley, they were asking for a catchweight....
:lol: i'm no expert by the way, on the contrary, those are just my observations. i may be wrong.
pac has already improved when he faced jmm the second time around relative to the first. he had better defense and balance. i think against diaz,...
at 140, jmm may still give pac problems style-wise. but i see pac winning nonetheless. see pac-barrera 2 or pac-solis and compare that to...
if it's for money, he's not getting that much fighting a shot to pieces morales.
