Robinson's a bit more explosive, but then Charles had a stronger base and better infighting. A bit more ugly as a fighter maybe... Although if you...
Same. But then Charles beat Charley Burley, and this was before his career-altering spell in the army. Charles was always a smart fighter, but...
Anyone agree? For me, he's the light heavyweight version, the differences being (pound-for-pound): - Robinson slightly quicker - Slightly more...
Ali 10-5.
Sorry to hear that.
Baby Arizmendi won the NYSAC Featherweight title in 1934. He was Mexican. He fought Wright, too, beating him twice. Wright is one of those...
It was, wasn't it? Although I don't think Monzon, in the first fight, necessarily enjoyed the home advantage. The Argentine scoring system was...
Well, he's the most complete fighter in history, isn't he? If you were to rate his various attributes, they'd look like this: Power 8/10 Speed...
Nice idea, although some might not be able to catch the fight or record it. Youtube another option?
:lol: ****ing hell.
Maybe because that's his birth name, and his religious name was a load of ****.
How far are you going to take this? Greb would be small fish to Marciano and ends up fried, battered and served.
I've heard of that before, maybe it was you who told me. I heard two defeats though, or was it four. No, 55-2.
Just to let you know, Nick, I'm backing you all the way here. No poster will ever convince me of how good Fitzsimmons was because I just know he...
I can't think of any who'd match that numerically, but there must be a fighter who fought eight or nine fights against a bit better opposition...
