Not necessarily numerically, although that does help. But someone who faced twenty decent champions might not be as 'proven' as some who faced ten...
How? Love to hear this one. We aren't talking about just wins, remember, just 'opponents faced.'
Nope. Ezzard Charles might be my pick for that, either him or Greb.
I did forget about McLarnin actually. I think he crammed in the best opposition for the number of fights he had, but there are fighters who were...
I've said Archie Moore before and I'm sticking with him. However, there are some major contenders who are pretty much inseparable from him; Sam...
Thomas Hearns didn't seem to develop knockout power until he turned professional. But Bob Foster was always a massive puncher even in his...
Hmmm... 1. Ezzard Charles 2. Archie Moore 3. Sam Langford 4. Gene Tunney 5. Harry Greb 6. Tommy Loughran 7. Michael Spinks 8. Bob Foster 9....
Nah. Ginger beer = ***** :yep
Emile Griffith.
Not sure, maybe at #9 or 10. Very well rounded fighter you know, his offence would also rate at about #9 or 10. His defence was a bit more...
Well, Foster probably would have hurt the heavyweights but they just imposed themselves upon him. Even in say, the Terrell fight which was mostly...
Moore's was probably only a six out of ten. He just knew how to go with a punch or take it on top of the head.
I never did think much of Gavilan as a technician. He was more than adequate of course, but not an exceptional talent in that area. He was a solid...
I don't mind 'coloureds.' As long as they keep off the streets.
Like us Brits would say; 'Tom Hauser is a ****.' I've hated the man with a deep passion since the very first time I heard him speak. 'The three...
