why would it matter? 154 would be a bad move he was a big broad guy and was fatless at 160...why would he or should he go to 154? he could...
you all be salesman....ALL
^cyclist
yeah but watch him. he didnt trade he just threw punches. then settled down when he got older....like absolutely every amateur of the last 30 years.
great exposition and information. stay in the lounge:good please:good
also jason litzau vs jose hernandez http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kFgYs7dcYQA
mijares vs darchinyan a slick, crisp punching, technically correct and flashy southpaw against a crude smaller older post hype exposed square on...
anyone feel like the bible of boxing needs a new tesitment [IMG]
[IMG]
of course. sort of agree with the fighters nowadays are not taught to fight but taught all the moves with little working knowledge of why you do...
1. there are less punchers because of bad technique 2. there are more fighters getting knocked out due to bad technique great logic
by the way ready 2 rumble had a charecter called wild stubby corley which is cearly based on coetzee
saurland trying to self-right the holyfield - valuev fiasco think it was something along the lines of "we can all get caught in the moment"...
i thought i was winning the first part of the round....:blood
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YbMWtTP6A2g ok maybe not denial but....whatevs
