for a while he might, but hes never going to win. His best strategy consists of waiting for old guys to gass out so that might work on 42 year old...
I wrote that two pages ago. ss to this new question, its a stupid one, Wlad was a unified champion.
hold on tostig, did you mean top five brit smw, thats ok with me. if you meant top five world then I still disagree COMPLETELY. sorry if there...
really no, tostig.
with corrie sanders tribute beforehand.
eubank doesnt represent smw scene, never has. What made you think he does, hes brit champ max, the brit smw scene.
hes still chris, its just degale is do bloomin awful now, he is actually shot, in the real sense. Pawing out a jab was his only meaningful weapon.
Canelo smash
because has never fought anyone of that calibre or above aside from wlad. I said that a while back. but you keep asking....stranger and stranger...
because has never fought anyone of that calibre or above aside from wlad. and sam obviously isnt much good, thats why hes lost to lower top...
i know hes not beat an elite yet but true fans know he will beat multiple elites soon, watch this space.
I fear for your mental health, dude, thats about it. Please try and make sense.
They arent better, your question is wrong. Helenius and CHambers arent worse than anything PUlev has won against. How am I avoiding a question...
there are no better wins of pulev. escape. ... lol
pulev, not chambers. pukevs never beaten anyone either, so worthless point claiming he never lost since then.
