No such thing as lucky in boxing (unless bad decision). Guys train very hard for what they earn. To say someone a contender and champion got...
Joe Louis for sure. I’d pick Joe over him regardless. Fury looks like he would be good against a lot of guys but can’t really say that as he’s...
I don’t think 70s is in the ball park of talent the LHW division had in the late 40s early 50s. The list is enormous.
Yeah Charles beat him. Not the best version of Moore yet imo. There wasn’t much film of him in the 40s and he didn’t develop into the fighter he...
He went through the best era and came out on top. 40s/50s line up was better. But it would be interesting
I would take Walcott Moore and Charles to handle Tua. That’s not a stretch. good job avoiding the skills aspect that you can’t seem to explain....
I didn’t ignore anything you wrote you ignored my statement. Simply being Qawi and Tua were more akin to Marciano then they were to Frazier and...
Defensive statistics. You know things that come into play when discussing skills. I’ll take all of those geriatrics to beat Tua except old...
Statistics, film, and results say otherwise yawn.
Tua was NOT a more scientific brawler. Tuas problem was he couldn’t bend as low as Qawi or Marciano. He also wasn’t as good as them at countering....
Marciano over Walcott 1 some others Walcott over Charles Foreman over Moorer Archie Moore v Davis Povetkin over Whyte
Walcott 1 must have been a crazy affair! One of my favorite fights.
Did you see any fights not on film?
I explained it. Because of amateurs. If someone’s been working the same style for five years as an amateur they aren’t going to learn a new one...
Can’t get enough Satterfield. Either he’s getting knocked out or he’s taking someone’s head off. All or nothing kind of fighter so rarely seen...
