I don't think I've been at all confusing or ambiguous. Skelton and Whyte, both decent "British level" brawlers. But not much good at world level...
I am not saying Skelton was much good. And yes he was old. Williams wasn't much good either. Whyte isn't much good. An old Povetkin isn't much...
Last time I checked, a guy called Otto Wallin was itching to fight him. Both of the belt holders would easily beat him. The British heavyweight...
The ratings don't really matter. They don't really denote quality.
No. Skelton was British, European and Commonwealth champion and fell short at world level. Whyte is similar but beat a couple of ranked fighters,...
Whyte is not Chagaev.
Povetkin was likely pretty much shot in both those fights and I think we all know that.
He fought Chagaev.
Povetkin's level at 41 years old in his last fight is an unknown really.
Why are those magazine ratings treated like holy scripture? Ratings do not decide head to head encounters.
Sprott at his best was decent. Not managed well though.
Helenius is cited among Whyte's best wins. But Helenius was knocked out by two guys who were on Wilder's bum defence circuit! Fighters Wilder is...
Yes. Skelton seems a bit more durable. Whyte is possibly a little bit stronger.
I rated Joseph Parker too. But let's be honest. He looked like total **** agsinst Cojanu and Hughie Fury. We ignored it because the division was...
:lol: Whyte isn't much good. Put him in the ring on a week's notice against a fit Audley, yeah he might get taken out too. Povetkin had been on...
