Morales was more versatile for sure, but not more effective for being so imo. Tito was a one trick pony but it got the job done well nevertheless....
It's a pity Tito wasted his peak years (95-99) fighting trash. But I suppose Don King had something to do with that. Could have really enhanced...
I always thought Tito was the better fighter of the two in a h2h ability sense, and was more dominant in his prime, but Morales probably...
I suppose he could have chosen guys that were beating Norris around the time like Santana and Brown. Instead he chose the limited Vasquez. :good
Good call, I'd probably favour Montreal Duran to beat Griffith actually.
I think tough boxer types with good work rates are probably the best style to beat Griffith. Graham fits that bill. I can definitely see him...
I think Benitez is too lazy a fighter to win. He has the skills to, but I can just see Griffith outworking him, and winning in a scrappy affair...
:lol: Surely some would have said Margarito and Cotto. Anyway, my pick of guys that beat him: Ray Leonard Luis Rodriguez Kid Gavilan Ray...
Luis Rodriguez - 4 times.
I used to think Tommy, but now I don't know. Gavilan didn't hit like Leonard, so if he's going to get Tommy out of there, he'll have to push a...
Na, but a majority of people feeling that you actually won might :good
Would that make Juan Manuel Marquez the greatest fighter since Sugar Ray Robinson?
You can think Pac wins this fight, but do you at least acknowledge that Forrest is a step up in ability to any welterweight Pac has fought thus...
He was generally just a bit slower than he was about 5 years earlier when he was peaking as a lightweight. That Chavez would have done better...
Chavez was past his prime against Whitaker, but he was no more past it than he was against Hector Camacho, or Greg Haugen. And in fact he threw...
