I saw an interview recently where they asked Wlad if he thought he could beat a prime Ali and Wlad responded that Ali is the greatest and will...
And the only ones who are justified in doing so are Haye (for his accomplishments at CW) and Froch. The rest haven't done anywhere close to enough...
No, he's #1 because he's quite clearly the best P4P fighter in the world today. Pacquiao was up there, but then he looked like absolute ****...
The problem is Trout hadn't really beaten anybody of note before Cotto, nor had Maidana or Lopez before they beat Ortiz, and how in the **** could...
When you suggested that USADA gives fighters three tries to get a negative test. Morales' opponent and the promoters were made aware of his dirty...
Trout just lost to Canelo and Maidana lost to Alexander, Khan and Kotelnik. Floyd would be the heavy favorite to beat any of those guys and hasn't...
Aww poor Ricky wasn't allowed to wrestle in a boxing match to make up for the fact that his boxing skills were dog**** and poor Victor got KTFO...
No, if the NSAC is in charge of the tests they actually have the authority to punish dirty fighters unlike USADA who are hired on to do nothing...
He's almost certain to win because he's just that good. Everyone he's faced has had the opportunity to either knock him out or convincingly win...
If not Floyd, then who is your P4P #1 and where does he rank on yor P4P list? :think
That link doesn't say anything about the NSAC... Just that "a reliable source" tells him CIR tests will be performed on all the samples.
Cool story hoe. :-((
Floyd clearly won that fight and Oscar didn't come into the ring hooked up to an IV like he did against Pacquiao. :deal
He didn't lose because Floyd was bigger though. He lost because Floyd was faster, sharper and just a flat out better boxer. Floyd didn't use his...
JMM is a great fighter, but he and Floyd already fought and Floyd won every round, so the idea that he's better than Floyd is absurd.