Touche
Harold Johnson was considered Archie Moore's #1 challenger for the better part of 5 years after his title shot loss to Moore in which Moore had to...
Pure conjecture. Wheres the evidence? None of this was borne out and frankly I cant think of a single person who would argue that Johnson was...
Ring magazine ratings count for DICk. Read my lips. They are nothing. Period. Ring magazine rating a guy means no more than me rating that guy....
People who complain about an amero-centric bias against Cerdan need to understand that Cerdan didnt even prove he was the best MW in France much...
Hopkins was fifty or near enough when he lost to Kovalev. Moore was retired by that point. And frankly put Hopkins competition, particularly the...
He was behind against Pompey at the stoppage, and if you dont think needing two results to come to conclusive victory over Rinaldi and Durelle is...
You are wrong and here is why: You make the same mistake a lot of casual observers make by using the Ring ratings. The Ring ratings were...
Struggling with guys like Durelle and Pompey doesnt give me confidence he could beat Hopkins at an advanced age. If Hopkins werent durable then Id...
Id favor 40 yr old Hopkins over 40 yr old Moore.
Wrong or lies, take your pick. Pompey was #3 not #1 Anthony was the only #1 contender Moore faced from 1956 until he retired. Period. In that...
Overrated
Well then lets tie this back to the OP and ask how strong Moores LHW era was in his 40s and does his resume reflect its strength? Because I would...
50/50
People go on about Archie Moore in his 40s but if you look at his record past 40 and read about his career youd see it wasnt very impressive....
