I suspect that i was talking here with kids(galvatron and in memory of jakelamotta) that were born after 1990. You give them answer for everyone...
Lol.. You right i don't know anything about ken norton and his carrer... Your point is so so stupid , you are saying that he was better in 1978...
To Convince you? Are you serious? Lol if you think that i need to convince anybody of a obvious thing..
douglas was not 6'4 nor 6'5. Douglas was 6'3 1/2. Douglas not just would not beat lyle "more easily" than foreman did but he would not beat lyle...
Lol. So you are saying that he was better in 1978 than he was in 1974 right? (The Víctory over quarry or the Víctory over a shot fighter? Rolf)
Rolf good night
Oh my god.. Oscar de lahoya of the natural size of lamotta.... Lamotta was a natural lhw if you did not know ... How old are you?
Ali would make bowe look a total clown.
Foreman lost in zayre against Ali because Ali was better.. Where is the excuse? Tell me... Was norton better in 1974 and 1973. Than he was in 1978...
The very best version of haye was better h2h
Norton fought ali in 1976 not in 1978 please.stop this ridiculous debate.. Norton was well past his prime by 1978
Lmao... So tell me... Are you saying that he was as good as he was in 73 and 74 if not better?
Strength and power foreman Speed and reflexes jones and clay Stamina rocky ,frazier and a lot of the old school era Toughness chuvalo,hagler,...
Tell me a rival of pacquiao that was even close to the size of lamotta... If you are going to talk about height and reach don't waste your time
so he was trying to fight a retired fighter, it makes great sense lmao Doesn't matter? Again it makes alot of sense lol No indication? Actually...
