Earlier this morning I was surmising that due to thousands of years evolution you could definitely defeat every single caveman in hand to hand combat.
This may shock you, sometimes a suspected trend isn't a trend at all.
It went up, significantly so.
Are you trolling? Look on any threads debating old timers v new timers and you'll see people saying boxing has evolved so old timers have no...
Well it does. Boxing evolves every generation yet an absolute fossil of a man was able to go and knock out the HW champion of the world. This is...
Like i said, he had no hype before the Mercer fight and at that point he wasn't seen as someone Lewis must fight. Lewis was either rematching...
No it's a tiny handful, 1 or 2 posters. They only say it because they believe in the evolution of boxing, and a man coming back 20 years later to...
No, it's was purely the belt. Wlad honestly had no hype whatsoever until he beat Ray Mercer.
There was the scene in Oceans 11, but the level gap between Lewis and everyone else was just seen as insurmountable. There was zero hype around...
Were you a boxing fan at the time? Because honestly the demand for Lewis v Wlad was nil. Bigger demand for a Tyson rematch than that.
Well Lewis stopped the better brother and advised a golfer how to stop the lesser brother.
I'd rather see a freakshow against Wilder than this. My ideal finish for him would be Parker, Zhang, Bakole, Wilder. But i think more likely it...
Of course a better version of Foreman beats an inferior version of Foreman. It shouldn't even be a question in anyone's mind. You're literally...
He didn't fight better opposition, he didn't fight better. It's the most insane opinion I've seen posted.
This is a mental opinion to have.
