Can someone please elaborate further on this supposed stylistic edge that Monzon has over Hagler? I'm just not seeing it.
Good post, though I disagree with portions of it as shown by my post to Ezzard.
Don't disagree with a good portion of this, but in the end, I just don't think it would be enough. Stylistically I think Hagler has the edge...
Hagler for me. I think Monzon tends to get overrated a tad.
Who cares, Peter sucks. Liston was clearly better functionally to land the harder blows. Who cares if Peter could or couldn't land a harder...
and sometimes it's a very factual one.
Right, and it's also much easier to do when you're facing some of the guys Louis was facing. It wasn't called what it was for no reason. Even...
He also lost to fighters significantly worse than Liston lost to.
Though, it should be noted, he likely should've won the belt the FIRST time he fought for it. So it's a little disingenuous to say it took him 5...
who would've: 1. Generated more money and bigger gates? 2. if they faced one another, would SRR been the heel and SRL the fan favorite?
Agree with most here, but I wouldn't say it's even arguable that Walcott was one of the worst...
Not buying it. Johnson will pick his spots to rush Norton, and that is when Norton is the most vulnerable. He's simply not as good fighting off...
You can rant all you want, the fact of the matter is, you are wrong and were proven wrong. It would be impossible for Johnson to be a subpar...
Louis, whenever he wants and how he wants. This is a non fight
I'm sorry, Louis isn't beating Foreman going toe to toe with him... Not happening.
