froch had just got going in that fight, groves was getting ragged, it would've turned out the same as the 2nd.
how awful. rip
damn. very sobering.
what if laing lived like fellow nottinghamian froch?
what if pep hadn't crashed in a plane?
bless. groves was en route to getting ktfo, as evidenced beyond reasonable doubt next time! what if dirrell had been given the nod in...
here's hoping you knock some sense in, i'll not hold my breath.
and you believe size is a measure of weight. some opinions aren't worth being entitled to.
nonsense, again. as stated before, size is a definition in and of itself. according to your "logic", a snooker ball is bigger than a tennis ball,...
again, it's not a thread claiming manny is smaller. check the title. for some reason *****s want their guy to hog all the credit for fighting...
yes, they're bigger. and 100% not exactly, by the way. dimensions are different to weight. size is a measure of the former. this is incredible....
au contraire, it's painfully obvious to anybody not an agenda-driven ***** what i mean by size. i haven't defined what i mean by weight either,...
we tried to ship all the idiots out to populate the colonies, but as you can see, some slipped through the net.
you never cared in the 1st place, hence your insistence on trying to conflate weight and size. yes weight, not size, is considered more important...
you think mack is a guaranteed "gimme" for cotto? he's better than that.
