Agree, far too much is placed on a loss nowadays.
Nobody in their right mind doesnt rate him, but to put him in the top 5 all time is beyond daft.
Completley agree, and the Witter example is a good one, he was awful on the night and quite clearly looking beyond but he still got close SD, yet...
[IMG] he's a great fighter bud but steady on.
Yes he did, for the first 4 rounds, after that giving a round to Hop is bordering on being a stalker.
Honestly dont know, it pisses me off. Even not so long ago it wasnt a big deal to fight 4 times a year, now youre lucky its 2.
Why?, Before Taylor or the rest of the crop of SMW's. Dont get me wrong, if Dawson at a C/W of 172 is the best he gets i'll be all for it, but...
You cant not rate Taylor on the basis he's moving up 2lbs from his last fight, Kessler-Taylor is a far bigger fight than Dawson-Kessler(Mikkel...
Who's at Lh thats more appealing than 168?. Dawson? whats he done apart from battering a 40 yr old and scraping by (controversialy) a 40 yr old?...
Kessler, does everything pavlik does but with skill, footwork and speed. Not close IMO.
He did look tired in the last round, he also looked tired late in the hop fight, you cant beat father time and hes 37, a thing a lot of people on...
It's ****wits like you that give the nuthuggers air to breathe. YOU are why when people say Calzaghe "fans" are the reason they dont like...
Hope they kept the euipment, they're bound to need it again if Chad cant get another 40 yr old in the ring.
Fixed
would be Calzaghes hardest fight thats out there, but would still fancy a points win for Cal, tho even closer than the last one.
