Problably louis would have more problems with some of them than vice versa
What a nonsense
holyfield never was considered a puncher. . tyson himself said that . Evander landed fast combinations a keep hitting once and again and again...
Pure speculation no fact here..
If it was ali then yes.. The difference of speed would be great .but we are talking about holmes... He did not have the chin of ali neither. Like...
I think that many people here are talking about the fellings and not with the facts on the table. Lewis is the logic winner and even by stoppage
+1
Lewis knocked him out ....and ruddock did hurt him...the tyson attack saved him more than his chin against ruddock in fact, Evander holyfield was...
Exactly
Foreman was a much more complete fighter than baer. Baer could hurt and drop joe but max would not keep him down. Baer did not have the upper of...
Jones had better natural athletic abilities. The guy was "feline". Speed and reflexes
If he had this great footwork why did he use it only in in 3 fights? Also if i have to be focused watching his feet then his great footwork was...
Well i am not talking about carnera or abe simons ... I am not talking about super hws necessarily. Louis would have problems with heavier hws...
Mmm louis vs carnera. Louis vs maxi baer. Lous vs billy conn. Louis vs schmeling louis vs buddy baer Louis vs walcott Louis vs bradock Louis...
I mean that he was overall very static,for example tyson looked much more dinamic on his feet. By the way how are you mate?