If... ok, I get it! In other words, you don't actually believe McCaffrey would beat Rademacher. Thanks... now I feel much better.
https://boxrec.com/en/event/115563
You're better than this... so why?
Only known case where a boxer was killed in the ring by his namesake: https://boxrec.com/en/event/115563
But that's clearly not true - of the 19 historians that so far have voted in the poll, 16 back Sharkey. Pretty clear margin, wouldn't you say?
Francisco Quiroz 11-15-1-1NC... only world champ to retire with a losing record.
Do I think a youngster, who has been past 6 rounds only twice, has better stamina than two 150+ fight HOFers? LOL... no, I obviously don't!
Yes, that Corey Spinks job was real nasty!
So the fact that we can point to to Roy Jones and Chris Byrd as unfortunate examples of boxers dieting down from heavyweight late in their careers...
I think Corbett is the best argument that old time style wouldn't have worked in this era! I mean, he was thought of as one of the best in his...
With better understanding about how the body works, it's possible that today's boxers are better conditioned than 100 years ago. It's certainly...
No, I don't think 6 rounds fights is enough to produce boxers with amazing stamina - but I think 12 rounds is. If you're going to fight 12 rounds...
You don't really believe that boxers 100 years ago were better conditioned (superior endurance) than today, do you? Is there any rason to believe...
I wasn't talking about ignorance - but arrogance. We don't all have an equal amount of knowledge - so some are bound to be more ignorant (or less...
So if someone doesn't see it your way, it's because he lacks the knowledge to understand that you are right, and he is wrong? Jesus... how can...
