No, I'm not offended at all - in fact, I'm having a good laugh! Your persistent refuse to tell us, how you arrive at those psi numbers... tells...
I always find it hilarious, when wannabe historians claim we today have lost the fine arts of feinting, slipping, parrying, etc. Apparently...
Exactly... and he no doubt knows this and is just trolling us. Some of the things he has said here are beyond surreal... I mean, no one can really...
But HOW do you get (for example) 1100psi for Hearns? WHAT IS THE MATH BEHIND THIS NUMBER? I don't know, if I can ask any clearer than that... but...
"Rounded up calculations"... yet you can't give us an example, of how this is done?
So does this mean, that there are no actual calculations behind these psi score... that they are pure guesswork?
I think everybody on this thread would be interested in the math behind your psi scores... so if you could give us an example, it would be great.
But against a psi machine, it's not about style or fear of losing - it's about trying to get the highest possible score. What I wan't to know is...
To me it looks like two men, from before boxing took a giant leap forward (20s and 30s). Absurd to think, either of these two would be competitive...
Based on the footage we have of Abe (against Kilbane)... no, he would not be able to compete, imo.
Fine, well thought out first post - welcome on board.
Just to make sure, that I fully understand what you mean: psi is an actual number, which tells us what force/energy a punch (or something else)...
I'm not sure, if you're serious - or simply trolling us! You have 147lbs Hearns at 1100 psi, and 160lbs Berlanger at 1050 psi - and at the same...
You have no doubt put a lot of work into this, and it's always nice to see posters doing some research of their own - rather than just repeating...
Jesus, you have been here for more than 7 years - and if you (should) know anything about boxing, it is that punchers come in all shapes and...
