sorry, yes...i'm talking about the fight a couple of years after the welterweight one.....for the middleweight title...but i dont think it was...
off topic.....that book, brian london's....is it good ?
i've been feeling like **** for days over this fight. i'm a huge hopkins fan, i see subtle things in the way he works that just amaze me...i think...
and that right uppercut...like at around 3.30 ish very ali-like
i was there that night....not only was it an amazing fight...amazing.....but, the whole night was an amazing event.....it was a mixed card of...
er..not a ***gott...honest guv and yeah, fickle...and yeah again, a suck up fair play to you for boxing, but be cool fella..if we were sat in...
as the actress said to the bishop......come again
am i right in saying that it was agreed before the fight that if armstrong didnt knock him out it would be declared a draw ??....how did that come...
i'd like to see that video
don't laugh too much, but i always thought he was the closest clue to how a prime tyson vs a 1970's ali would have gone.
dunno if this fits in this thread, if its overlooked or not...i just dont hear it talked about much.. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M0h8uKgkU9s
i was going to say that late as usual.
ok, he was. but, and bear with me here...he'd have bulked up in that year for hagler, he wouldnt have gone in at 147....also, would it be fair to...
all i have to add is that enzo could have easily beaten ola afaolbi...and put a lot less effort into it than he did by getting defeated. ola has a...
true...i did :) i can't joke about dallas though....sad story that....watching him against skelton was proper sad, he wanted to get beat up that...
