yes, all we watched that foreman had real problems with these guys and all was real, foreman was jumping like bugs bunny he always did it when...
he was fine yeah, but against holmes he was in his absolute peak, but tyson is better, he did beat holmes badly and holmes stopped ali
and after reading the view of the biased hater... now we can read a more coherent view and that is the point, foreman was a green kid when he did...
you don't understand that you don't have more reason because "fleischer said". it is only about opinions, the most of boxing historians never...
the same conney that was 224 in his prime in shape at 6'6? at 238 looked **** with his fragile frame of spaggethi.? physically the weakest 6'6 guy...
yeahhhhh like i said you are the undisputed champ mate
yes, because if you admit that it is good would not leave you in a good position Totally irrelevant, Frazier showed it also against Ali!! , with...
exactly.... the people always trying to change the reality.. what if i could fly... the truth is that lewis saw his oportunity and took advantage...
did fleischer say it too?
no, it is not dumb at all, the concept " nearly ko" is very real and a fact. it is when a guy is drunk on his feet with poor balance,on the other...
fleischer who watched... fleischer who saw.. fleischer said... who i am?
no, ali was better
really? do you have a glass ball?
beating a big static slow and easy target like valuev is one thing and beating a combination of huge size, power ,speed,strength and athleticism...
probably the dumbest argument in the history of this forum lmao
