Coming from you, I'll take that as a complement.
Yeah, Haye's a ****. Nothing new. But if he beats Charr that makes two opponents whom Vitali has already given opportunities to whom Haye has...
That's all irrelevant. Haye beating Charr makes him eligible as an opponent for Vitali, since Charr was already deemed worthy, as was Chisora.
Tyson would have wrecked Rahman, even the old mentally shaky version. He already smashed Clifford Etienne up around that time with a single shot;...
Yes he should. But that doesn't make him any less of a contender now, does it?
Then it would befit Vitali to fight him at some point, no?
Yes he did. Have you even watched the fight? And Holmes was far from shot when they fought.
I can think of a few modern(ish) heavyweights. Chris Byrd - incredible defensive skills, pin point accuracy, very underrated heart. Would have...
No, Vitali doesn't have to do anything. But he'd lose a lot of face if he didn't fight Haye in lieu of another opponent.
This era is boring, frustrating and loaded with fatasses. It's not one of the worst ever (in terms of skills) but it's definitely one of the most...
Charr was given a shot, which made him a legitimate contender according to Vitali and his team. Haye beating Charr thus also makes him so. Do you...
I'm not saying he's avoiding legitimate contenders. I'm saying I would have a problem if he did. The winner of Haye/Charr is a legitimate...
He will be if he beats Charr.
Stiverne's a legitimate contender.
I've got no problem with him retiring. I have a big problem with him avoiding legitimate contenders.
