now you know why you're a ***** in real life. you have to be petty and think you get 'rep pointsø from this otherwise. you've never been...
thats what i thought. you cant answer what i put infront of you.
where are you pulling your 'if' from in the highlights? and there's a good reason why you're getting petty replying to me. just answer the...
you said..frank warren's actions had little or nothing to do with joe fighting jones or hopkins in their prime. i've explained why fighting in...
haye..but who cares?
but mayweather had his speed....using "if" doesnt change anything. both are superb fighters but completely different.
its not that amazing to have those attributes if you fight second tier fighters or those that are past their prime. you're defending a good...
this i want to hear. lets see if you can do it without farting around. go....
you know why the politics is important but you also know why you cant reply to this straight. i'm use to people being dismissive to my posts...
then why are you waiting for the rematch, as your avatar states, and refuse to reply to this guy sensibly? if you reply like that to people...
well done. that makes you more objective than some imo.
it sounds to me like you're trying to mirror achilles now from the safety of your home..... you want to throw judgments like that around over...
you 'forgot' to mention pacman's weight jump..which is also very important
you better do better than that if you disagree with someone. that response means "i dont know what to say".
hopkins priced himself out of the fight because calzaghe was high risk low reward - like kessler is now when he calls out hopkins without earning...
