does the "when top fighters finally decide to fight him" sound familiar to people who have been defending calzaghe for all these years? someone...
froch and kessler won't be big bucks until they move up themselves.
my last post tonight....
very well done. it's often people defending their preferences.
reply to my post if you state "facts". but you dont...you're always on the defensive when you post and you havent answered a post straight up yet.
thats very childish. hes replying to me and i'm not from "philly". either defend the point or don't... but don't just reply and dis someone...
so where is your defence of it if you disagree?
i'm tired of people who want to be blinkered on this.... its always the ****ing brits who want to try to 'gentle' a fight or their fighter....
welcome to planet earth
floyd - pacman is the money fight and hatton-pacman makes a lot more sense than floyd - hatton. beating hatton, if that happened, solidifies...
i agree with you on that. zab had all the talent in the world - literally. he did lack the mental capacity and maturity was a big factor too.
no you're talking about something completely different than what i'm talking about. i said if you've been in the game and you're still watching...
because like i said in my next post - hes a better fighter than that
its been 'over the top' becuase hes such a damn good fighter who is trying to 'cement his legacy' on past it greats and he could have done better...
atually i'm getting tired...its late in denmark...
