I agree with everything except the last line..
Is it just me.. Or does it seem like that the older this fight becomes, the more people believes that Froch won? :huh
Nope.. The fab 4 was one of the greatest trilogies of all time.
Kessler was generally hitting Froch more.. Kessler landed some nice power shots on Froch's body (i think that people are over looking this).. And...
You are a pathetic man.. Calzaghe was 37 years old, had just cleaned the 168 division, beated the man at 175 in his first fight at that weight.....
Kessler landed more shots and was the agressor through the fight. 116-113 for Kessler..
Peyton Manning is much greater than Archie Manning
But Briggs was also like 35 years old.. What about a prime 27 year old Briggs?
Could Briggs pull a Corrie Sanders on Wlad? Or is the "new" version Wlad good enough to keep Briggs away? I have always wondered this, because on...
A 12 round war?
Beyer Mundine Froch Sartison Andrade.. All Dishwashers? :huh
Kessler has been fighting the best the division has to offer :patsch.. Now get the **** off you pathetic biased moron
I go with Hagler.. He was a beast in his prime at middleweight..
IMO both of the klits controls range better than him.. So no.
I believe that Holmes would stop him.. I doubt that Jones would be able to beat an elite HW..
