his wins over griffin and hill mean hes elite, but HoF for one valid win is crazy. Unification is a solid case for being elite too, unless like...
they both did, but its interesting that you think only one did when there were 2 people in the ring. vits was a more durable fighter than his...
true, I would if there was a 4th place but theres only 3 candidates so why bother. Tones cant go lower than last in this.
yeh Dariuz is obviously a really good fighter too so its a shame he did it. Now all he has is one valid title fight to show for his entire career....
they kept them to set fake records.
no wbo was then invalid title
but u just inferred in your last post that people's characters cant be judged by messageboard content, so how do you know hes uncivil?
jnr and bhop tied, 2-ton 2nd. if jnr had not that one drug thing, he's top.
let me explain....he means more civil on messageboards presumably, not your comparative actions in wedding videos or at origami class. but true...
he brought a broader base of ability to the ring but less depth. h2h better i guess yes.
Vits never showed evidence that he could beat a real champ, his best effort was 6 round fat sam or retired corrie sanders, a failed middling...
with the hindsight we have now, its unsettling to be even considering it for a Parkinsonians patient.
someone who needs three attempts to win a title, elite? ha, pull the other one. He struggled to reach the top berth of world class, how can he be...
F1 and rallysport cars of the 90s had the edge in the 90s, they were toned down for safety reasons. Humans havent evolved since the 90s. HOw...
