thats right. it's ignorance to label a fighter that way.
want to vote on that one?
pleased you can give hopkins props but calzaghe's win over hopkins was opportunistic and you know it. i'm going to keep saying it until you...
i agree completely. he's one of the best fighters in history to carry his skills past the age of 40 without question. people are always fast...
yes it would. but have you considered why joe needs a man 8-9 years younger than him to lose to someone he's already beaten to bolster joe's rep?
this has nothing to do with that. i think you're being irresponsible suggesting that in this situation.
people are right to have joe a distant fourth but it's also the british posters who believe otherwise and stick on the forums anyway that i...
they do have the competiton if they are willing to chase it. but you hit the nail on the head when you said "being the greatest (british...
why do you think he hasn't got that recognition after all this time - even though he's been undefeated and the best super-middle of his era?
jesus..it's not about "old school". hopkins, like calzaghe, has always been in prime, prime condition for any fight. but what happens in the...
well done. 'gassing' is sometimes an ignorant excuse for not understanding what happens in a fight. this, in my opinion, is exactly that type of...
no i meant jones and hopkins. but the "never going to happen" part was purely up to JC. forget ottke. no-one in his right right mind should...
thats true about them actually. didn't think about their natural regime.
hopkins is known for talking ****. he just wants to talk and someone to listen at press conferences. he's trained longer than that - trust me.
...which sometimes involves knowing when you need a breather. ïf the ref allows it it's only smart to milk it.
